It is the preferred deployment of a certain industry leading MSPĮDIT2: Would you accept additions from trusted/vetted individuals? I understand fully that you might want to only have your and your company’s name attached to information you have determined yourself. In a real-world scenario, I can show you hundreds of large, big-name hotels that have a Nomadix gateway with NAT disabled, and the NAT/routing being done by a Watchguard firewall. Personally I would have a Mikrotik above it. The answers would be:Įdit: The reason I would personally include this is that many people would like to have a USG or UDM in the network, but use something above it for the routing functionality. Maybe this isn’t something you deal with, but I would personally have put into this spreadsheet “Able to disable NAT”. You also can’t select the SFP+ as WAN1/Primary, it is always Secondary. Also on the UDM Pro, Load Balancing isn’t yet available, since it isn’t in the UI. I think the Load Balancing WAN for the USG should be “via command line” - at least every time I see someone setting up load balancing on the USG they’re doing it from there. I am even less interested in doing anything outside the SDN on the UDM than I ever was with USG. While there are some things you can do via command line on the UDM, almost everything is wiped on restart. Operatins System,BSD,Linux,EdgeOS / UniFi SDN,UniFi SDN,EdgeOS / UNMSįor the UDM, everything that you have as “via command line”, to my understand should be “No”. Lawrence Systems Reviewed Firewalls Comparisonįeatures,pfsense,Untangle,USG/USG-Pro,UDM/UDM Pro,EdgeRouter
0 kommentar(er)
